Using Primary Sources
While textbooks provide a good overview of what happened, they are not
the same as reading the words of people who actually lived through a particular
event. Textbooks offer an interpretation of a historical person or event by
those who did not witness them or live during that time period. Reading primary
sources allows us to judge whether we agree with that interpretation because we
will have read or seen the same primary sources as the textbook author.
If you have not read primary sources before, you might be surprised to
find that it is not like reading from a textbook. Primary sources--diaries,
manuscripts, journals, images, drawings, memoirs, and maps—created by
those who participated in or witnessed past events reveal something that even
the best article or book cannot.
Primary sources do not speak for themselves—they have to be
interpreted. You do not just simply read about the past, you must investigate
the past by asking questions.
To help you interpret primary sources, you might think about these
questions as you examine the source:
A. Place the document
in its historical context
B. Understanding the
document
C. Evaluate the
document as a source of historical information
Asking yourself these questions as you read will help you understand
and interpret the document for yourself. It is very tempting to use the
textbook as a source of interpretations, especially if you encounter a primary
source you do not completely understand. A critical part of the process of
reading and using historical sources is figuring out what the documents can
tell you about a past event, and to decide whether you agree with the
interpretation offered by the author of your textbook. Primary sources support
the authorÕs interpretation of the event, so without primary sources, he or she
has no basis to make a conclusion about the past. Reading primary sources
allows you to interpret WisconsinÕs past by providing the tools and evidence
needed to make informed statements about the world around you.